Thoughts

The Operating CFO

The people who should be scared of AI aren't the ones you think.

For the first time in a generation, the size advantage is up for grabs. Small businesses just have to reach for it.

August 13, 2026 · 7 min read

Ask who should be most afraid of AI and you will hear the usual answers. Workers. Copywriters. Coders. Customer service teams. I think that misses the largest target in the room. The entity with the most to lose from AI is not a job. It is corporate America itself.

To see why, you have to understand what made big companies big, and how much of that advantage AI just quietly deleted.

The moat was always money

For as long as any of us have been working, scale was the whole game. The bigger the company, the better capitalized it was, the more specialists it could hire, the more custom technology it could build, the more polished an experience it could deliver. That gap was the moat. A small business could not build proprietary software, staff a real finance team, and run a seamless customer experience all at once. It simply could not afford to.

Venture capital ran the same play, deliberately. Pour a large amount of money into the right team with the right angle, buy scale faster than anyone else could, and use that scale to build a moat wide enough that competing became impossible. Capital was the weapon. The moat was the goal.

And it worked so well that it reshaped the economy. Business concentration and profit margins have risen across most US industries over the past two decades.1 The before-tax corporate profit share of GDP more than doubled from 1980 toward recent highs, while the share of income going to workers fell.2 A large body of research ties that concentration directly to inequality: a small number of dominant firms capture a growing share of sales and pass less of it through to workers.3

This is the uncomfortable part. The consolidation of corporate power is one of the real engines behind the widening income gap, and it is a big reason that running or working at a small business has, for decades, not been a reliable path to even a middle-class life. The size advantage did not just win markets. It bent the whole distribution of who gets ahead.

What changed, and when

Here is the shift, and I want to be precise about it, because it is easy to overstate. AI has not erased every moat. Network effects, distribution, regulation, brand trust, and proprietary data are all still real advantages that money and size can buy. Those did not vanish.

What collapsed is the capability gap. The specific advantages that used to require a Fortune 100 budget, custom software, a sophisticated back office, a premium and seamless customer experience, are now available to a company with almost no headcount. A single owner can now punch at a weight that used to require hundreds of employees to reach. That was not true a year ago. It is true now.

You do not have to take my word for it. Look at what is already happening.

5.6M
new US business applications in 2025, up 24% since ChatGPT launched4
+45%
growth in AI-related business formations since November 20225
30%
of entrepreneurs say AI made it easier to start their business6

This is not a forecast. It is a surge that already happened, concentrated in exactly the knowledge-heavy sectors where AI does the most work. Professional, scientific, and technical services are forming new companies at more than 5,000 per month, a record.7 Researchers describe what AI is doing in plain economic terms: it is lowering the minimum efficient scale of a business, the revenue level at which it finally makes sense to hire a specialist.8 Translated, the work that used to force you to staff up can now be done without staffing up at all.

One number that should stop you cold

If you want the whole thesis in a single example, here it is.

Read that last line again, because it is the entire point. The tools were not proprietary. The thing that used to separate the giant from the upstart, access to capability, was available to both. The giant’s size stopped being a moat and started being a cost.

Why the incumbent is the one who should sweat

Size cuts both ways now. The same scale that used to protect a large company also makes it slow. Layers of approval. Legacy systems nobody wants to touch. A hundred stakeholders for every decision. Meanwhile the tools that let a two-person shop match a corporation’s capability are precisely the tools that reward speed, nimbleness, and a willingness to rebuild how you work.

That is the small business’s oldest advantage, suddenly paired with capability it never had before. You can move first. You can change your mind on Tuesday. You can talk to every customer yourself and rebuild the experience around what you hear, next week, not next fiscal year. For once, being small is the edge and being big is the liability.

This is the most optimistic thing I believe about this technology. It is the first real chance in my lifetime to widen who gets to build something valuable, and to push against a concentration trend that has been running one direction for forty years.

But the window is the catch

None of this is automatic. A tool that is available to everyone is, by definition, an advantage to no one unless you actually deploy it well. The surge in new businesses is real, and so is the pile of them that will adopt AI badly, bolt it onto old habits, and get a faster version of their old chaos.

The opportunity is not “AI exists.” The opportunity is being one of the operators who wields it correctly while it is still early enough to matter. First movers get the compounding. Everyone else gets to catch up.

And this is the part that is genuinely hard, and where I spend my time. Deploying this well takes two skills that rarely live in one person: someone who knows how to build the systems, and someone who knows what a business actually needs them to do. Most owners have neither the time nor both halves, and that gap is exactly where a strong operator earns their keep.

The bottom line

For forty years, the safest place to stand was inside a big, well-capitalized company, and the hardest place to build a good life was a small one. AI is the first force I have seen with a real chance to flip that. The capability gap that justified the whole arrangement has narrowed to almost nothing, and the data shows people are already pouring through the opening.

So if you own a small business, the fear is aimed the wrong way. You are not the one who should be scared of this. You are the one it was built for, if you move before the giants wake up.

Be the first mover. Lean into the speed and nimbleness that were always your advantage. And lean hard into the technology that, for the first time, lets you compete at a scale that used to be off limits.

Sources

  1. ITIF, “Monopoly Myths: Are Markets Becoming More Concentrated?” (2020), summarizing Census and academic evidence; NBER, “The Economics and Politics of Market Concentration” (2019).
  2. Washington Center for Equitable Growth, “How market power has increased U.S. inequality” (2019), citing Akcigit & Ates and De Loecker, Eeckhout & Unger.
  3. Autor, Dorn, Katz, Patterson & Van Reenen on “superstar firms” and the falling labor share; US Joint Economic Committee, “Concentrated Corporate Power Is Holding Back Our Economy.”
  4. Citadel Securities research note (July 2026) citing US Census Bureau data, reported by PYMNTS, “Business Applications Jump 24% as AI Lowers Startup Costs.”
  5. US Census Bureau Business Formation Statistics, reported August 2026 (AI-related formations up 45% since November 2022).
  6. Gusto survey data, “How AI Is Reshaping Small Business Formation” (2026).
  7. US Census Bureau projections reported by IBTimes and Bloomberg (2026): professional, scientific, and technical services forming 5,000+ businesses per month, a 24% year-over-year increase.
  8. Citadel Securities, on AI lowering the minimum efficient scale of a business (2026).
  9. Reporting on Medvi via The New York Times, summarized by PYMNTS (2026). Figures reflect the company’s first full year; comparison figures are Hims & Hers’ reported annual results.

Figures are accurate as reported by these sources at the time of writing and are worth a fresh check before publication, since business-formation data is revised and the Medvi numbers come from company reporting.

More pieces like this — in your inbox.

When the next one lands. No filler, no drip funnel.

Like the worldview? Want the implementation?

Book a 20-min intro